<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Privacy on Guy Freeman</title><link>https://gfrm.in/categories/privacy/</link><description>Recent content in Privacy on Guy Freeman</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gfrm.in/categories/privacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On Owning Your Data</title><link>https://gfrm.in/posts/on-owning-your-data/</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gfrm.in/posts/on-owning-your-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I step on a bathroom scale and my body fat percentage gets beamed to a server in Shenzhen. This is the arrangement. In exchange for this intimacy, the app suggests I upgrade to premium, which I find touching in a way the developers probably didn&amp;rsquo;t intend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t have a problem with companies making money — I have a problem with the default. The default is: your body&amp;rsquo;s measurements belong to someone else&amp;rsquo;s database, and you&amp;rsquo;re welcome to look at them through their app, on their terms, until they pivot to a different business model or get acqui-hired and shut down the API. The data isn&amp;rsquo;t especially sensitive on its own. Nobody is going to blackmail me with my impedance readings. But if I can&amp;rsquo;t own the numbers that describe my own physical form, what exactly can I own? It&amp;rsquo;s a question worth asking, even if the answer turns out to be &amp;ldquo;not much, but you should try anyway.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>